Comparison
n8n vs Make
A practical comparison for small businesses choosing between n8n and Make. No star ratings, no pretend test lab, just structured decision criteria.
Comparison table
| Criteria | n8n | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation | Automation |
| Best for | Teams that want control, custom logic and self-hosting options. | Teams that want flexible visual automation with branching logic. |
| Pricing model | Cloud and self-hosting options; pricing depends on deployment and usage. | Free plan available; paid plans scale by operations and features. |
| Key features | Workflow editor, Code steps, Self-hosting, Webhook triggers | Visual automation builder, Multi-step workflows, Scheduling, Routers and filters |
| Strengths | Flexible for technical workflows, Good self-hosting path, Helpful for custom integrations | Strong visual builder, Good for complex workflows, Large app directory |
| Watch-outs | Less beginner-friendly than simple no-code tools, Self-hosting requires maintenance | Advanced scenarios can take time to learn, Usage planning matters for busy workflows |